Tag Archives: film

Everything but the Screen: Finding Mystery and Romance in Digital Dalliances

Walking home this wintry Melbourne night, I passed under a pair of sneakers hanging from the telephone wires above a crossroads, and was struck by how archaic that old marker of a drug pick-up point seemed. Did people really ever hang out on street corners waiting for their hooded dealer to turn up with an ounce of dope? If they didn’t just use the telephone then, they’ve got plenty more options to choose from now. I imagine an online courier business would work rather well.

Street art by Skewville

The thing is, the immediacy of personal, digital communications devices means nobody has the patience to work on that sort of a clock anymore. Except maybe in Peru, or in remote indigenous communities far from this particular inner-city street corner. In which case, pull up a pew. The telephone line’s not in use, so maybe bring a letter writing set too. I hear the postman passes round this way on Tuesdays.

The immediacy of digital technology removes a lot of the mystery from our lives, some of which can be rather thrilling. Gone is that building of excitement that comes when you just have to wait for something – like finding out who won the game when you get home from work, or waiting till Thursday night for the next episode of your favourite TV drama, instead of downloading it early or buying it on DVD from overseas (although it’s got to be said, the DVD marathon is one of today’s many pleasures). What about hanging around that pretty girl’s favourite café in case you accidentally-on-purpose bump into her? You’re probably more likely to pull off those sorts of casual, just-popping-by airs on Facebook than in the bookshop.

Technology vs. Romance?

I had the privilege of being in Edinburgh during its world-famous Fringe festival last year. One of the highlights was York theatre group Belt Up, patroned by none other than Dame Judi Dench. Belt Up went about transforming one floor of a big old building (owned by the University of Edinburgh and now only in use during the festival due to extensive fire damage) to look like the interior of a 1920s house. Inside this magical space, their wildly original and surreal comedies transported audiences back in time, to the bohemian circles inhabited by Spanish poet Federico García Lorca (Lorca is Dead), and to the home of much loved children’s author and creator of Peter Pan, J. M. Barrie (The Boy James).

My friend, a gorgeous little thing from Rome who liked to wear grandpa jackets, train driver hats and horn-rimmed glasses bigger than her face, began a romantic affair with a member of the troupe. He was quietly spoken and thoroughly British, with foppish brown hair and good, strong shoulders. Perhaps because she was so romanced by the historical setting of their plays, she refused to give him her mobile phone number. And so they were forced to rendezvous at exciting hours in the ephemeral festival bars, or chance encounters in poster-covered stairwells on their ways to separate shows.

The elimination of technology from their courting injected some magic – and indeed, romance – into what might have otherwise been an enjoyable, but more conventional, holiday fling. When the not-so-heady Scottish summer waned and the besotted couple in turn went their separate ways, there was the requisite emotion and grief; yet the memory of their time together was left intact and pure, untainted by the inevitable markers of a dying romance: the length of phone calls and text messages decreasing, the days between them increasing. The nature of their encounter seemed to distill and celebrate the very thing that matters most in relationships: direct, in-person communication.

Throwing an Electric Spanner in the Works

If technology removes some of the mystery from our lives, genre writers must be tearing their hair out. I remember once watching an episode of Buffy and shaking my head in disbelief as her party faithful ran round hysterically, crying “Where’s Buffy? We can’t find Buffy!” and imagining all sorts of perilous, vampiric ends for her. Why didn’t they just ring her mobile, duh? Panic-driving plot devices like this one can now be trumped by phoning on the run, which means the storyboarders require a little more ingenuity. I suppose the flip side is they’ve now got a lot more to work with when it comes to sci-fi monsters and techno-dystopias. Meanwhile, period dramas such as Mad Men, Deadwood or Downton Abbey are even more appealing for their old world, pre-digital charm.

There’s another way in which our communication devices cause hiccups in storytelling: a screen doesn’t look particularly exciting on another screen. Face-to-face conversation, replete with theatrical expressions and spit, is a far more compelling depiction of character interaction than texts or online chats, and even the old phone conversation. There’s something jarring about having to constantly cut between two people in different places for the duration of a conversation that already feels unnatural anyway. The requisite small talk – “Hi, how’re you going?” – is often glaringly omitted, and too frequently characters neglect to say their farewells before hanging up. (Er, rude! I think you’re de-friended.)

Digital devices provide endless fun for the person using them, but are rather boring (or irritating – think headphones up way too loud on the train) for anyone else around them. I’m reminded of one night, pre-smartphone-owner, when I went out to the pub and became incredibly fed up with my friends who repeatedly pulled out their phones and fiddled around with their apps (if that sounds a bit wrong, that’s because it is). Etiquette, schmetiquette. Us self-involved Westerners should take a leaf out of the Japanese Big Book of Social Niceties (or maybe the ever-popular Social Primer‘s blog pages), and save our personal bits for when we’re in private. No-one wants to hear you yelling at your boyfriend on the street … through a phone. And if you’re selfish enough to not give a rat’s arse about anyone else’s comfort, then at least consider how you might look to them – a bit mentally challenged.

Bringing back good manners: Boston based artist Nick Rodrigues inside his mobile phone booth

“Carn, Show us Yer Texts!”

But technology can do some stuff that more direct interaction isn’t always so good at. Naughty stuff, for instance. It’s easy to hide behind the anonymity of internet chat rooms and proffer vitriolic comments that we’d never say to a person’s face – but removing that nakedness, if you will, of stark, face-to-face contact can also work in the positive. I’m not sure how well I’d do sexy talk over the phone, but having a greater buffer between yourself and the receiver through, say, texting, makes it easier to say a few cheeky words. Phones are still quite personal, though – you’re still giving something of yourself, opening yourself up, when you choose to give someone your phone number. For these reasons, texting is a great invention for anyone who struggles with expressing themselves intimately. Even if that’s not a problem for you (you lucky thing you), it’s still a quick and precise way to remind someone of intimacies shared. Just don’t try to say anything too deep – it may backfire.

© 2011 The Cultured Animal

Muggers are also surely benefiting from the ubiquity of personal digital devices. Who wouldn’t want to exact revenge upon an obnoxious Gen Y who’s wandering obliviously across a road, punching away at buttons, ears plugged up, stylish haircut obscuring everything but the screen? Petty theft just got a whole lot more profitable. I’m not sure why Spain’s economy should be struggling so much, what with its high incidence of pick-pockets. Sure, wired-up youngsters might be fitter than your easy-target Nan, but they’re probably about as switched on, and these days they’re sporting smart phones, headphones, iPods, iPads, netbooks, scooters and expensive sneakers. (Though if Nan’s carrying a wad of cash in her purse, your odds might still be best with her).

Perhaps that’s what the sneakers are doing are up there – they didn’t fit the thief.


Anarchy in the UK?

Is anyone else disturbed by the recent protests in the UK? I am for various reasons, most of which seem to throw up more questions than answers.


Call a violent protester a violent protester

I find it disturbing that the small minority of people who committed acts of violence during the protests have been dubbed ‘anarchists’. Anarchist philosophy does not necessarily espouse violence. On the contrary, it poses an alternative to the perceived violence of government. Certainly anarchist offshoots such as punk and skinhead subcultures have been associated with violence. But we must distinguish anarchist philosophy itself from these movements. Fair enough if these particular protesters were waving anarchist flags of their own, but it’s not helpful when responsible journalists throw the label around indiscriminately without any disclaimer.

So, stop calling violent protesters anarchists and start calling them something else. I don’t know. Be creative. How about British Ninjas (they wear balaclavas, it’s kind of cool).

The end of pacifism?

I tend to come from the pacifist, Ghandi-loving school of thought that thinks violence is not going to give you a credible voice, and that people who throw ammonia-filled lightbulbs at police (who the hell thought of that anyway?) discredit a protest movement and give a bad name to all the other respectable citizens who are trying to get their, you know, mature and sophisticated voices heard. (Kind of like the way violent disgruntled youth appropriating anarchist symbols discredit the whole philosophy of anarchism).

I have never seen the kind of violence that is happening in London at protests in Australia (I’m talking about recent history, because I can’t claim to have attended any protests in the preceding century). Protests as I know them are sort of like a (noisy) walk in the park, after which you feel a bit exhausted, down-trodden and depressed. In 2003, millions of people around the world took to the streets to protest against the war in Iraq, breaking world records for the largest rally. There were an estimated 150,000 protesters here in Melbourne. The march was not only large but civil. Yet lovely Mr Howard and his government politely pretended none of this had ever happened and went ahead anyway. It didn’t matter how many people marched or how civilised they went about doing it. It was never going to change a thing. It seems, dear people, we have lost our power.

This does tends to make one feel a little bit cynical. And there are a couple of ways that could push you. You could just let the cynicism morph into apathy, go back home, turn on the TV and have yourself a nice big bowl of pasta, thank you very much. But if the problem that is getting people’s goat is really affecting enough people, directly, well, people are going to seek other methods of expression. A war happening in a distant country might stir moral upset in some people’s stomachs, but something like that is easy to forget once you’re back in your office chair. Having your pension cut, however – or your fifth child’s benefit cut, or your unemployment benefit cut – that is another kettle of fish entirely (let’s not get into kettling right now). That is something a lot of people can relate to. And if their government continues to ignore them, they’re only going to get more angry. If peaceful protesting achieves nothing … well, the people are going to get a bit less peaceful, aren’t they.

Throw a few molotov cocktails around Hyde Park – well, that’s bound to get the powers-that-be quivering on their ottomans. Maybe there is something to be said for the role of violence after all. It’s not our fault they didn’t listen the first time.

As for the punks and skinheads – wearing scary shit is intimidating, and that kind of has a way of helping you have things your way.

Without meaning to bang on about skinheads too much, I couldn’t fail to mention here Shane Meadows’ triumphant film This Is England. Equally brilliant is his heart-breaking, follow-up 4-part TV serial, This Is England 86. But watch out – it’s heavy stuff.

Long live the welfare state

I think it’s great that the Brits are sticking up for taxes. I’m sorry, did you say taxes? Like, OMG! But seriously, people seem to forget that taxes pay for many privileges and benefits that we have more or less come to expect in our civilised lives. Things like government schools, public health systems that foot the bill of your Dad’s unexpected triple bypass, or treatment for your daughter’s mental breakdown. Maybe a little beer money in your jeans pocket whilst you party away your student years. Or the funding for a local library, so you can educate yourself for free (I would just like to point out that former Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating was a self-educated fellow, and such was the extent of his cool that he even had a musical written about him).

Taxes give back to our society in so many crucial ways. They give us a safety net. They make it that little bit harder to end up homeless. So it’s nothing short of criminally unfair that ‘tax’ has become a dirty word. In the same way that Anarchism has, and in the same way that Communism has. When Obama decided to strengthen the US public health system with reforms, everyone started calling him a dirty commie. Because taxing people in order to then give them back a safety net in case they get sick is, er, Communist. Yeah, with a capital C. WTF?

I don’t think people should ever have to pay beyond their means for a sickness that’s unlikely to be their own fault. It’s bizarre that the neo-conservatist obsession with privatisation has gone so far in a country that is supposed to be founded on civil liberties. Surely the right to equal access to health care, education, public transport and so on are part of these basic rights. And it’s the elected government’s job to manage these services. Otherwise what’s the bloody point of having a government.

Britain has a solid history of state welfare, and it’s clearly something that they’re proud to defend. So I say, hats off to the Brits for hanging onto public welfare for their goddamn lives, lest they get thrown back into the dark and dangerous experiment of Thatcherism. I’m not the first person to have commented that the violence curdling underneath everything is a throwback to something we’ve all seen before. Seriously, have the Tories learnt nothing?

An uncertain future

What might this mean for the future of British politics? Labor squandered their credibility and lost the last the last election, but people don’t seem too chuffed with the government(s) they voted in, either. What choices do the people have left, if not these three (unwise) monkeys? Oh fuckit, let’s go with anarchism …

*(I will conveniently ignore for the time being that we went ahead and re-elected that government)


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.